As of 12 October 2026, three kinds of state law affect American children online. First, Texas’s app store law is in force: a child’s Apple or Google account opened in Texas since late May or early June 2026 must be linked to a parent, who approves each download and purchase. Second, social media account laws are enforceable in Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and most of Texas, and blocked or partly blocked in Georgia, Utah, Arkansas, Ohio, Virginia and Louisiana. Third, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, California and New York have laws that start in 2027. None of these laws places any duty or penalty on parents.

“Blocked by a court” often means blocked for some apps only

Several court orders protect only the companies that sued, or the members of the trade group that sued. Louisiana’s law is permanently blocked for ten named companies and enforceable against every other covered platform. Virginia’s one-hour limit is blocked for NetChoice members only. So a headline saying “court blocks state law” can be true while a smaller app your child uses still has to comply. The status column below says who each order protects.

App store age laws: Texas is live, four more start in 2027

App store laws put the age check on Apple and Google, not on each app. Under the Texas model, which Utah, Louisiana and Alabama copied, the store verifies which of four age bands an account holder is in (under 13, 13–15, 16–17, 18 or over). Every minor’s account must be linked to a parent account. The parent then consents to each individual download, purchase and in-app purchase; the Texas statute forbids blanket consent. California chose a different design: one age question when a device or account is set up, then an age-band signal sent to apps, with no approval for each download.

State and lawStartsWhat a parent will seeStatus on 12 Oct 2026
Texas SB 24201 Jan 2026 on paper; enforced since June 2026Child’s account linked to yours. You approve every download and purchase, and approve again when an app makes a “significant change”. Before you approve, the store must show you the app’s age rating and what personal data it collects.In force. A district court blocked it on 23 Dec 2025. On 4 June 2026 the Fifth Circuit suspended that block while Texas appeals. On 6 July 2026 the Supreme Court refused to lift the suspension. The appeal was argued on 4 Aug 2026 and is undecided.
Utah SB 142, as amended by HB 498 (2026)6 May 2027Same consent model. Existing accounts must be verified within 12 months. Apps that come preinstalled on the device are covered too.Not yet in force. The 2026 amendment moved the start date back a year and removed state enforcement. Only private lawsuits remain: the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per violation. The industry lawsuit was dropped after the amendment.
Louisiana HB 977 (Act 185 of 2026)1 July 2027Same consent model, covering app stores on any connected device, including games consoles and VR headsets.Not yet in force. The 2025 version (Act 481), due on 1 July 2026, was repealed before it ever took effect. The Attorney General enforces, up to $10,000 per violation. No lawsuit found.
Alabama HB 161 (2026)1 Jan 2027Same consent model. Accounts that already exist must be verified before 1 Oct 2027.Not yet in force. The Attorney General enforces, up to $7,500 per violation. No lawsuit found.
California AB 10431 Jan 2027A birth date or age prompt when an account is set up on the device. Apps receive only the age band. No approval for each download.Not yet in force. Amended in September 2026 by AB 1856, which we have not been able to read in full. See the note at the end.

What a Texas parent sees right now

Apple told developers that from 4 June 2026, new Apple Accounts in Texas require age assurance plus parent or guardian consent for minors’ downloads, in-app purchases and significant app changes. Apple also said parents can revoke consent for an app they approved earlier. Google says its Play Age Signals API began returning signals for eligible Texas users who created their accounts after 28 May 2026. Neither notice says how accounts created before those dates are handled. If your child’s account is older, do not assume the approval screen will appear for it.

The consent screen is more useful than it looks. Before you approve, the store must show the app’s age rating, the content behind that rating, and whether the app or purchase involves collecting, using or sharing personal data. Read that screen instead of tapping through it. Approving each download in turn is no substitute for an app limit or content restriction, so keep using Screen Time and Family Sharing or Family Link as well.

Social media account laws, state by state

These laws regulate the platforms directly, through age checks, parental consent, feed rules or time limits. Almost all of them have been challenged by NetChoice or CCIA, two technology industry trade groups. The column on the right gives the latest court action we could find.

State and lawWhat the law requiresStatus on 12 Oct 2026
Florida HB 3 (2024)No accounts for under-14s on covered platforms. 14- and 15-year-olds need parental consent. Covers only platforms that meet usage thresholds and have at least one listed “addictive feature” such as infinite scroll, autoplay or push notifications. Services that are only email or direct messaging are excluded.In force. On 25 Nov 2025 the Eleventh Circuit suspended the district court’s injunction, 2–1. The appeal was argued on 10 Mar 2026 and is undecided.
Texas HB 18, the SCOPE Act (2023)Users register an age. For anyone registered as under 18, the platform must limit data collection, give a verified parent supervision tools, and let the parent review, download and delete the child’s data.Mostly in force. The parental tools and data rights were never blocked. On 24 July 2026 the Fifth Circuit kept a block on the content monitoring and filtering duty (for CCIA and NetChoice members) and vacated a broader injunction won by a student group. Texas has asked the full court to rehear the case, and the ruling has not yet taken effect.
Mississippi HB 1126 (2024)Reasonable efforts to verify the age of every account holder. A parent’s express consent for any minor’s account.In force. The Fifth Circuit suspended the injunction on 17 July 2025, and on 14 Aug 2025 the Supreme Court declined to step in. The appeal is pending.
Tennessee HB 1891 (2024)Age verification for account holders, parental consent for minors’ accounts, and supervision tools for parents.In force; no injunction. On 28 Aug 2026 the Sixth Circuit told the trial court to reconsider its refusal to block the law. That request is pending again.
Louisiana Act 456 (2023)Age verification and parental consent for minors. Adults may not message minors they are not already connected to. Parents get tools including daily time limits.Blocked for ten named companies only (permanent injunction, 15 Dec 2025): Meta (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp), Nextdoor, Pinterest, Reddit, Snap, X, YouTube, Automattic (Tumblr), Discord and Amazon (Twitch). It can be enforced against other covered platforms. The appeal is pending.
Georgia SB 351 (2024)Age verification, and parental consent for under-16s.Blocked for all platforms by a preliminary injunction of 26 June 2025. The appeal was argued on 10 Mar 2026 and is undecided.
Utah SB 194 (2024)Age assurance. Maximum-privacy defaults for minors, with autoplay, infinite scroll and push notifications off. Parental consent to loosen them.Blocked for all platforms since 10 Sep 2024. The appeal was argued on 20 Nov 2025 and is undecided.
Arkansas Acts 689 (2023), 900 and 901 (2025)Act 689: parental consent for minors. Act 900: no overnight notifications by default and a parental dashboard. Act 901: bans features a platform knows cause addiction, self-harm or eating disorders, and lets parents sue.Blocked. Act 689 is permanently blocked for everyone. Acts 900 and 901 are blocked only for NetChoice members. The parents’ right to sue under Act 901 is not blocked. Appeals are pending.
Ohio Social Media Parental Notification ActParental consent before an under-16 opens an account.Still blocked in practice. On 18 June 2026 the Sixth Circuit reversed the permanent injunction, but on 17 Aug 2026 it put that ruling on hold while NetChoice asks the Supreme Court to review it.
Virginia SB 854 (2025)Under-16s limited to one hour per day per service unless a parent changes the limit.Blocked for NetChoice members only (27 Feb 2026). Fourth Circuit argument is set for 28 Oct 2026.
Nebraska LB 383Age verification, parental consent, and parental tools to see a minor’s posts and messages.Partly in force. On 27 June 2026 the court blocked the age-verification and consent requirements but not the parental tools. Cross-appeals are pending.
California SB 976No personalised (“addictive”) feed for a minor without parental consent. Private account by default. Age assurance required from 1 Jan 2027.Partly in force. The feed-consent rule and the private-account default stand. The limits on notification hours, the hidden-like-count default and the annual report are blocked. Meta, TikTok and Google have separate appeals pending.
New York SAFE for Kids ActNo algorithmic feed and no notifications between midnight and 6 a.m. for under-18s without parental consent. Adults must be offered an age-check method other than a government ID.Starts 25 Jan 2027, 180 days after final rules were published on 29 July 2026. No lawsuit found.

“Undecided” means we found no appeals court decision in the docket entries available to us on 12 October 2026. Appeals courts can rule on any day, so if your state is one of these, check before relying on the table.

Design codes: rules about defaults, not about accounts

A third group of laws, usually called “age-appropriate design codes”, sets no age minimum. Instead they require the most protective settings by default for users the platform knows or should know are children.

  • Maryland Kids Code: in force since 1 Oct 2024. A NetChoice lawsuit is in discovery, and no injunction has been entered.
  • Nebraska LB 504: operative since 1 Jan 2026, with Attorney General penalties available from 1 July 2026. One default is no notifications from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., or from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on school-year weekdays.
  • Vermont Act 63: starts 1 Jan 2027. By default, known adults cannot see, message or comment on a minor unless the minor allows it, and there are no push notifications between midnight and 6 a.m.
  • California AB 2273: mostly unblocked since April 2026, after the Ninth Circuit narrowed the injunction to the data-use and dark-pattern rules.
  • South Carolina HB 3431 (2026): challenged by NetChoice. A request for an injunction was pending at the last docket entry we could see.

Separately, in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (June 2025) the Supreme Court upheld Texas’s requirement that pornography sites verify users are 18 or older. That decision is why so many states’ adult-site age checks are now in force while the social media laws are still being argued.

Rights parents can use today

Most coverage of these laws describes what platforms must do. Several also give parents something they can ask for, or a claim they can bring.

  • Texas, social media: if your child’s account is registered as under 18, the SCOPE Act requires covered platforms to give a verified parent tools to control the child’s privacy and account settings and to monitor and limit time spent. Each platform must also publish a way for you to request that it let you review and download, and delete, the personal data it holds about your child (§ 509.103). Parents may sue for a court declaration or an injunction, but not for money, and not as a class action.
  • Florida: a parent or guardian can ask a covered platform to terminate an under-14’s account, and the termination must take effect within 10 business days. A minor account holder can sue for up to $10,000 for knowing or reckless violations.
  • Arkansas: the private right of action for parents in Act 901 was left in place because the Attorney General does not enforce it, so a court order against him could not block it.
  • Utah, from 6 May 2027: a minor or parent harmed by an app store or developer violation may sue for the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per violation.

These rights attach only when the platform knows your child is a minor. In Texas, for example, the SCOPE Act protections apply to an account registered as under 18. An account opened with an adult birth date gets none of them.

What none of these laws do

  • They place no duty, fine or offence on parents or children. Every obligation falls on platforms and app stores.
  • They protect only the age a service believes your child is. A false birth date, or an adult’s account handed over, sits outside all of them.
  • Several exclude messaging. Florida’s law, for example, does not cover services that are only email or direct messaging, which is where much stranger contact happens.
  • They do not replace device-level controls. The settings in our iPhone and iPad and Android guides work in every state, whatever happens in court.

What to do this month

  1. Check the birth date on each of your child’s accounts: Apple or Google, and every social app. Every law on this page relies on the age the service believes.
  2. Find your state in the tables above and note whether its law is in force, blocked, or blocked only for some companies.
  3. If you are in Texas and your child’s store account was created after the June 2026 change, read the age rating and data disclosure on each consent screen before you approve.
  4. If you are in Texas, look in each social app’s settings or help pages for the parent request form the SCOPE Act requires, and use it to see or delete what the app holds about your child.
  5. Set the device controls anyway: Screen Time with Ask to Buy, or Family Link with purchase approval. They apply whatever the courts decide.
  6. Diary the 2027 start dates that affect you: California and Alabama on 1 January, New York on 25 January, Utah on 6 May, Louisiana on 1 July.

How we checked, and what we could not

Each status above was checked between 10 and 12 October 2026. We read the enacted bill text on the state legislature sites, the court orders and opinions themselves (from the courts’ websites and CourtListener), the Supreme Court’s docket, the New York Attorney General’s announcement, and Apple’s and Google’s developer notices. Court dockets mirrored on CourtListener can lag the official record by days or weeks.

Some things we could not verify, so they are not summarised above. California enacted further laws on 10 September 2026, including AB 1709, which amends SB 976, and AB 1856, which amends AB 1043. The official California legislature site blocked our access, so we have not read their final text. We also could not confirm how Apple and Google treat Texas accounts created before mid-2026. We will update this page when we can read the primary sources.

For how platforms check age in practice, see why every app suddenly wants to check your kid’s age. For federal law, see our KOSA and COPPA explainer. Families outside the US should read the regional differences guide.

General information, not legal advice. Laws and court orders change; verify against the official sources below before relying on any detail.

Common questions

Is my state’s kids’ social media law actually in effect?

As of 12 October 2026: Florida, Mississippi and Tennessee’s laws can be enforced, and most of Texas’s SCOPE Act is in force. Georgia’s and Utah’s are blocked for all platforms, and Ohio’s remains blocked while NetChoice seeks Supreme Court review. Arkansas’s 2023 law is blocked for everyone, but its 2025 laws and Virginia’s only for NetChoice members, and Louisiana’s only for ten named companies. New York’s starts on 25 January 2027. Appeals courts can rule on any day, so check the court’s docket before relying on any status.

Why does Texas make me approve every app my child downloads?

Texas’s App Store Accountability Act (SB 2420) requires app stores to link a minor’s account to a parent and get consent for each download, purchase and in-app purchase; blanket consent is not allowed. A court blocked it in December 2025, but the Fifth Circuit suspended that block on 4 June 2026 and the Supreme Court declined to lift the suspension. Apple applies it to new Texas accounts from 4 June 2026; Google to accounts created after 28 May 2026.

What does “blocked for NetChoice members” mean?

Some court orders protect only the companies that sued, or the members of the trade group that sued. Louisiana’s 2023 law, for example, is permanently blocked for ten named companies, including Meta, Snap, YouTube and Discord, but can still be enforced against other covered platforms. Virginia’s one-hour limit for under-16s is blocked for NetChoice members only. A smaller app your child uses may still have to comply.

Can parents use these laws directly?

In some states, yes. In Texas the SCOPE Act lets a verified parent of a child registered as under 18 use supervision tools and request to review, download and delete the child’s data, and to sue for a declaration or injunction. In Florida a parent can have an under-14’s account terminated within 10 business days. From 6 May 2027, Utah’s app store law lets a harmed minor or parent sue for the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per violation.

Do US state kidsDo these state laws replace parental controls?rsquo; online laws replace parental controls?

No. They bind platforms and app stores only, and they protect only the age a service believes your child is, so an account with an adult birth date gets nothing. Several exclude messaging services, and court orders can change their status overnight. Device controls such as Screen Time with Ask to Buy or Google Family Link work in every state, whatever happens in court.

When parental controls change

Parental controls get renamed and moved without announcement. Roughly monthly we send new guides, changes to controls like these, and scams worth knowing about.

Free. No ads, no affiliate links, and we never sell or share your address.